On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:04:52PM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote: > Thanks for writing this, I chose a slightly different approach at > https://public-inbox.org/git/20170728171817.21458-2-sbel...@google.com/ > which might be quicker for local testing.
I'm actually going to rework the patches to be much more similar to that. I've been convinced that's an easier approach to the series, and I like the simplicity. My goal is not only to identify failing tests, but to exercise the hash algorithm logic so that we find any hidden dependencies outside of that code. For example, I noticed some of our Perl scripts have hard-coded empty-tree object IDs in them, which obviously will need to be fixed. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
