On 02/06, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:23 AM, Thomas Gummerer <t.gumme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 02/05, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 10:13:05PM +0000, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> >> > - if (opts->new_branch)
> >> > + if (opts->checkout_existing_branch)
> >> > + fprintf(stderr, _(", checking out existing branch '%s'"),
> >> > + refname);
> >> > + else if (opts->new_branch)
> >> > fprintf(stderr, _(", creating new branch '%s'"),
> >> > opts->new_branch);
> >> I wonder if "creating branch" and "checkout out branch" are enough.
> > I thought printing the branch name might be a good idea just to show
> > more clearly what the dwim did.
> No no printing branch name is definitely a good idea, especially when
> I think of one thing and type another. I shortened my example phrases
> too much. It should have been "creating branch %s" and "checkout out
> branch %s"
Ah sorry I misunderstood. Yeah I think that makes sense then :)