Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:

> It's very tempting considering that the amount of changes is much
> smaller. But I think we should go with my version. The hope is when a
> _new_ call site appears, the author would think twice before passing
> zero or one to the safe_path argument.

Wouldn't it be a better API if the author of new callsite does not
have to think twice and can instead rely on the called function
untracked_cache_invalidate_path() to always do the right thing?

Reply via email to