Jonathan Tan wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:26:58 -0500 > Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
>> I agree that it shouldn't matter much here. But if the name argv_array >> is standing in the way of using it, I think we should consider giving it >> a more general name. I picked that not to evoke "this must be arguments" >> but "this is terminated by a single NULL". [...] > This sounds reasonable - I withdraw my comment about using struct > string_list. Marking with #leftoverbits as a reminder to think about what such a more general name would be (or what kind of docs to put in argv-array.h) and make it so the next time I do a search for that keyword. Thanks, Jonathan
