Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]> wrote:
> The fundamental thing is the actual Git commands, not the tests in the
> testsuite, no?
Right. I've never been picky about exit codes; only that a
non-zero happens on errors.
> In the rest of git, die() makes a command exit with status 128. The
> trouble here is that our code in Perl is assuming the same meaning for
> die() but using perl's die builtin instead. That suggests a few
> options:
>
> a) We could override the meaning of die() in Git.pm. This feels
> ugly but if it works, it would be a very small patch.
Unlikely to work since I think we use eval {} to trap exceptions
from die.
> b) We could forbid use of die() and use some git_die() instead (but
> with a better name) for our own error handling.
Call sites may be dual-use: "die" can either be caught by an
eval or used to show an error message to the user.
> c) We could have a special different exit code convention for
> commands written in Perl. And then change expectations whenever a
> command is rewritten in C. As you might expect, I don't like this
> option.
I don't like it, either.
> d) We could wrap each command in an eval {...} block to convert the
> result from die() to exit 128.
I prefer option d)
