On 28/02/18 00:42, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Ramsay Jones > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On 27/02/18 22:05, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> OK, somehow I had the version from Ramsay on a topic branch that was >>>> not merged to 'pu'. Here is the replacement for 2/2 I'd be queuing. >>>> >>>> We'd need SZEDER to sign it off (optionally correcting mistakes in >>>> the log message) if we are going with this solution. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>> >>> I guess I missed Ramsay's v2 which already did this >>> >>> <[email protected]> >> >> Yes, and as I said in the cover letter, I wasn't too sure that >> I had passed that patch along correctly. ;-) >> >>> so I'll use that version. We still want sign-off from Szeder, >>> though. >> >> I would be happy with either version, or maybe Szeder would like >> to tweak the commit message. In any event, it would be good to >> get sign-off from Szeder. > > Certainly, here you go: > > Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <[email protected]>
Thanks! > However, I'm not sure about the authorship and taking credit for the > patch. We ended up taking my patch, sure, but I think Ramsay did all > the real hard work, i.e. writing the commit message and, most > importantly, realizing that something is wrong with that '...| sort' at > the end of the line. No, the patch and the credit are yours, I was just trying to help out and get the patches moving forward. At most, I would think a 'Helped-by:' would be sufficient to note my input. [BTW, my 'Signed-off-by:' on that patch was in the spirit of the dco section b. - again I wasn't quite sure ...] ATB, Ramsay Jones
