On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:15:44AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> > That's probably a reasonable sanity check, but I think we need to abort
> > and not just have a too-small DISPLAY array. Because later code like the
> > hunk-splitting is going to assume that there's a 1:1 line
> > correspondence. We definitely don't want to end up in a situation where
> > we show one thing but apply another.
> Yes, agreed completely.
Let's add this sanity check while we're thinking about it. Here's a
[1/2]: t3701: add a test for interactive.diffFilter
[2/2]: add--interactive: detect bogus diffFilter output
git-add--interactive.perl | 8 ++++++++
t/t3701-add-interactive.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)