> On 06 Mar 2018, at 23:53, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Also "UTF16" or other spelling
>>> the platform may support but this code fails to recognise will go
>>> unchecked.
>> That is true. However, I would assume all iconv implementations use the
>> same encoding names for UTF encodings, no? That means UTF16 would never be
>> valid. Would you agree?
> After seeing "UTF16" and others in "iconv -l | grep -i utf" output,
> I am not sure what you mean by "Would you agree?"  People can say in
> their .gitattributes file that this path is in "UTF16" without dash
> and that is what will be fed to this coe, no?

On macOS I don't see UTF16... but I just checked on my Linux box and
there it is. Consequently, we need to check both versions: with and
without dash.

I'll reroll ASAP (I try to do it first thing in the morning).


Reply via email to