On Tue, Mar 13 2018, Michal Novotny jotted:

> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> <ava...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 13 2018, Michal Novotny jotted:
>>> Hello,
>>> currently, if I try to create a tag that has tilde "~"  in name, an
>>> error is raised. E.g.
>>> $ git tag rpkg-util-1.4~rc1
>>> fatal: 'rpkg-util-1.4~rc1' is not a valid tag name.
>>> Now, actually it would be very cool if tilde was allowed in a tag name
>>> because we would like to use it for tagging pre-releases of (not-only
>>> rpm) packages.
>>> Is there some deep technical reason why tilde cannot be present in a
>>> tag name? I tried that e.g.
>> Yes, because a trailing tilde is part of git's rev syntax, see "man
>> git-rev-parse", or try in any repo:
>>     git show HEAD
>>     git show HEAD~2
>>     git show HEAD^~2
> Right, reading the man pages:
> <rev>~<n>, e.g. master~3
>            A suffix ~<n> to a revision parameter means the commit
> object that is the <n>th generation ancestor of the named commit
> object, following only the first
>            parents. I.e.  <rev>~3 is equivalent to <rev>^^^ which is
> equivalent to <rev>^1^1^1. See below for an illustration of the usage
> of this form.
> Would it be acceptable to disallow only ~<n> (<n> as [0-9]+) in a tag
> name but allow ~[^0-9].*, i.e. if the immediately following symbol
> after '~' is a letter, do not
> interpret ~ as a special character. Could it work?

We could make that work, with some caveats:

 1) The syntax we've reserved for refnames is quite small, and my bias
    at least would be to say you should just make a tag like
    rpkg-util-1.4-rc1 instead (as e.g. git.git and linux.git do).

    Carving out an exception like this also means we couldn't use
    ~[^0-9].* for anything magical in the future.

    But I think that's a rather small objection, we have other syntax
    escape hatches, and we're unlikely to use ~[^0-9].* as some new

 2) If we patch git to accept this, you'll be creating refs that aren't
    inter-operable with previous versions of git.

    This is a big deal. E.g. you'll happily create this special ref,
    then try to push it to github, and they'll croak because that's an
    invalid ref to them. Ditto some co-worker of yours who's using an
    older version of git.

    FWIW if you manually create such a tag e.g. for-each-ref will emit
    'warning: ignoring ref with broken name' and just not show it.

>> etc.
>> Although I guess git could learn to disambiguate that form from the tag
>> you're trying to create.
>>> git tag rpkg-util-1.4%rc1
>>> but percentage sign does not seem to be particular fitting for
>>> pre-release marking.
>>> Thank you
>>> clime

Reply via email to