Elijah Newren <new...@gmail.com> writes:

> However, my question here about what to write to the working tree for
> a rename/rename(2to1) conflict in one particular corner case still
> remains.

Hmph, is it a bad idea to model this after what recursive merge
strategy does?  I think what is written out from that codepath to
the working tree has the nested conflict markers (with a bit of
tweak to the marker length, IIRC) in it.

Reply via email to