On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Adam Spiers <g...@adamspiers.org> writes:
>> diff --git a/pathspec.h b/pathspec.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..8bb670b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/pathspec.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
>> +extern char *find_used_pathspec(const char **pathspec);
>> +extern void fill_pathspec_matches(const char **pathspec, char *seen, int 
>> specs);
>> +extern const char *treat_gitlink(const char *path);
>> +extern void treat_gitlinks(const char **pathspec);
>> +extern const char **validate_pathspec(const char **argv, const char 
>> *prefix);
> Protect this against multiple inclusion with "#ifndef PATHSPEC_H".

Yep good idea, how should I submit this?  It will cause a trivially
resolvable conflict with the next patch in the series (17/19):

  pathspec.c: extract new validate_path() for reuse

but I'd prefer not to re-roll 16--19 when just 16 and 17 are sufficient.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to