Martin Ågren <martin.ag...@gmail.com> writes:

> Your reading seems correct, so I was wrong in my speculation. My guess
> is such a patch would be welcome. I checked a couple of man-pages and
> this one seems particularly heavy on 'git foo' as opposed to `git foo`.
> I think that's a reason to fix it, not to leave it behind.

Sounds sensible.  Hopefully there isn't a topic in flight that wants
to change this file, so it may be a good time to do a wholesale
cleanup of it.

Reply via email to