Derrick Stolee <sto...@gmail.com> writes:

> How about we do a slightly different
> arrangement for these overflow commits?
>
> Instead of storing the commits in the commit-graph file as "0" (which
> currently means "written by a version of git that did not compute
> generation numbers") we could let GENERATION_NUMBER_MAX be the maximum
> generation of a commit in the commit-graph, and if a commit would have
> larger generation, we collapse it down to that value.

Sure.  Any value we can tell that it is special is fine.  Thanks.

Reply via email to