Thomas Gummerer <t.gumme...@gmail.com> writes: > I didn't find a good way to implement "reluctant completion" (I'm also > by no means an expert in bash completion, so there may well be a way I > couldn't find by googl'ing around), so I left that out of this > series. > > I don't think it's strictly necessary for the deprecation either, as > we can just print a warning message when the user actually uses 'git > stash save' at some point, which would make a message printed when > using the completion redundant anyway. I feel like that warning > message is not something we're quite ready for yet and I'd rather wait > a few more releases before doing that though.
Yeah, I agree that what you outined above is quite sensible. Thanks, will queue.
