Hi Leif,
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Leif Middelschulte
<leif.middelschu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for updating the patch on top of Stefan's series. :-)
> /* Case #1: a is contained in b or vice versa */
> if (in_merge_bases(commit_a, commit_b)) {
> oidcpy(result, b);
> + output(o, 1, _("Note: Fast-forwarding submodule %s to the
> following commit"), path);
> + output_commit_title(o, commit_b);
Level 1 is for conflicts; I don't think this message should have
higher priority than "Auto-merging $PATH" for normal files, so it
needs to be 2 (or maybe 3, see below) rather than 1. (The default
output level is 2, so it'd still be shown, but we do allow people to
remove informational message and just get conflicts by setting
GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY to 1, or request extra information by setting it
higher)
Also, this two-line message seems somewhat verbose compared to the
other messages in merge_submdoule(), and when compared to the simple
"Auto-merging $PATH" we do for normal files. The multi-line nature of
it particularly strikes me; the merge-recursive code has generally
avoided multi-line messages even for conflicts.
In comparison, your original patch just had ("Fast-forwarding
submodule %s", path).
Maybe you could "if (show(o, 3)) { output your current message } else
{ output the simpler message }" ? Or is this verbosity warranted for
submodules at the default print level?
I'm not a heavy user of submodules, so I may need to get others to
weigh in on the verbosity and multi-line aspects, but I wanted to at
least flag this as somewhat surprising to me.
Elijah
