Jens Lehmann <jens.lehm...@web.de> writes: > Right, and me thinks that would warrant a --force option for deinit > to do that even if the submodule contains local changes (which would > make deinit fail otherwise).
Probably. > Additionally Michael and Marc spoke up > that they would rather have a --all option to deinit all initialized > submodules and "git submodule deinit" without any arguments should > just produce a usage message. As I saw no voices against it that'll > be part of the next iteration too. Yeah, I forgot about that possible surprise of deiniting everything under the sun by default. I am not sure if "--all" is a good way forward, though. Can you defeat it with "git submodule deinit ./--all" or something to limit the target only to one submodule whose unfortunate location is named as such? If you have such a support, I have this suspicion that you already get a short and explicit way to say "everything under the current directory" with "git submodule deinit ." for free. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
