On 18 May 2018 at 11:37, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote: > > toward the bottom of "man git-stash", one reads part of an example: > > # ... hack hack hack ... > $ git add --patch foo # add just first part to the index > $ git stash push --keep-index # save all other changes to the stash > ^^^^^ ??? > > i thought that, even if "--keep-index" left staged changes in the > index, it still included those staged changes in the stash. that's not > the impression one gets from the above.
So would the error be in the part of the man-page quoted below? If the --keep-index option is used, all changes already added to the index are left intact. That is, this doesn't say *where* things are left intact (in the index? in the working tree?). The man-page does start with git-stash - Stash the changes in a dirty working directory away which to me suggests that "leaving something intact" refers to precisely this -- the working directory. Or is it the name of the option that trips you up? That is, you read the name as `--keep-the-index-as-is-but-stash-as-usual`, as opposed to `--keep-what-is-already-in-the-index-around`? While I'm sure that some clarification could be provided, I'm tempted to argue that is exactly what the example provides that you quoted from. Martin
