Am 19.05.2018 um 04:07 schrieb Elijah Newren:
There is really no need for four branches of nearly identical messages
when we can store the differences into small variables before printing.

Oh, there is a reason for the repeated message text: translations! Please do not play sentence Lego with translated strings. The original code is preferable.

It does require a few allocations this way, but makes the code much
easier to parse for human readers.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <new...@gmail.com>
---
  merge-recursive.c | 36 +++++++++++-------------------------
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index 273ee79afa..3bd727995b 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
@@ -1290,31 +1290,17 @@ static int handle_change_delete(struct merge_options *o,
                if (!ret)
                        ret = update_file(o, 0, o_oid, o_mode, update_path);
        } else {
-               if (!alt_path) {
-                       if (!old_path) {
-                               output(o, 1, _("CONFLICT (%s/delete): %s deleted in 
%s "
-                                      "and %s in %s. Version %s of %s left in 
tree."),
-                                      change, path, delete_branch, change_past,
-                                      change_branch, change_branch, path);
-                       } else {
-                               output(o, 1, _("CONFLICT (%s/delete): %s deleted in 
%s "
-                                      "and %s to %s in %s. Version %s of %s left in 
tree."),
-                                      change, old_path, delete_branch, 
change_past, path,
-                                      change_branch, change_branch, path);
-                       }
-               } else {
-                       if (!old_path) {
-                               output(o, 1, _("CONFLICT (%s/delete): %s deleted in 
%s "
-                                      "and %s in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree 
at %s."),
-                                      change, path, delete_branch, change_past,
-                                      change_branch, change_branch, path, 
alt_path);
-                       } else {
-                               output(o, 1, _("CONFLICT (%s/delete): %s deleted in 
%s "
-                                      "and %s to %s in %s. Version %s of %s left in 
tree at %s."),
-                                      change, old_path, delete_branch, 
change_past, path,
-                                      change_branch, change_branch, path, 
alt_path);
-                       }
-               }
+               const char *deleted_path = old_path ? old_path : path;
+               char *supp1 = xstrfmt(old_path ? " to %s" : "", path);
+               char *supp2 = xstrfmt(alt_path ? " at %s" : "", alt_path);
+
+               output(o, 1, _("CONFLICT (%s/delete): %s deleted in %s "
+                      "and %s%s in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree%s."),
+                      change, deleted_path, delete_branch, change_past,
+                      supp1, change_branch, change_branch, path, supp2);
+               free(supp1);
+               free(supp2);
+
                /*
                 * No need to call update_file() on path when change_branch ==
                 * o->branch1 && !alt_path, since that would needlessly touch


Reply via email to