On 05/21, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:56:47AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > > > > It is very much about > > > comparing two *ranges of* revisions, and not just any ranges, no. Those > > > ranges need to be so related as to contain mostly identical changes. > > > > range-diff, eh? > > > > > Most fellow German software engineers (who seem to have a knack for > > > idiotically long variable/function names) would now probably suggest: > > > > > > git compare-patch-series-with-revised-patch-series > > > > or short: > > > > revision-compare > > compare-revs > > com-revs > > > > revised-diff > > revise-diff > > revised-compare > > > > diff-revise
I haven't really been following all of the discussion but from what I can tell the point of this command is to generate a diff based on two different versions of a series, so why not call it 'series-diff'? :) -- Brandon Williams
