Stefan Beller <[email protected]> writes:
> 'item->dst' has not been assigned if '!rhs' is true. As the caller is allowed
> to pass in uninitialized
> memory (we don't assume 'item' was zeroed out before calling), this fixes an
> access to
> uninitialized memory.
Did I miss the other 4 patches that this might depend on it?
> diff --git a/refspec.c b/refspec.c
> index c59a4ccf1e5..ea169dec0d3 100644
> --- a/refspec.c
> +++ b/refspec.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static int parse_refspec(struct refspec_item *item, const
> char *refspec, int fet
> * - empty is not allowed.
> * - otherwise it must be a valid looking ref.
> */
> - if (!item->dst) {
> + if (!rhs) {
> if (check_refname_format(item->src, flags))
> return 0;
> } else if (!*item->dst) {
Perhaps a better fisx is to explicitly assign NULL to item->dst when
we see there is no right-hand-side.
Aside from the "uninitialized" issue, the original if/else cascade
around here makes a lot more sense than the updated version. If we
do not leave item->dst uninitialized, the control (and the readers'
understanding) can flow without having to carry the invariant
"item->dst is set ONLY when rhs != NULL" throughout this codepath,
in order to understand that this if/else cascade is asking: is
pointer NULL? then do one thing, otherwise is pointee NUL? then do
another thing, otherwise we have a non-empty string so do something
on it.
