On 06/05, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> 
> > --- i/Documentation/config.txt
> > +++ w/Documentation/config.txt
> > @@ -3327,13 +3327,13 @@ submodule.<name>.ignore::
> >  submodule.<name>.active::
> >     Boolean value indicating if the submodule is of interest to git
> >     commands.  This config option takes precedence over the
> > -   submodule.active config option. See linkgit:git-submodule[1] for
> > +   submodule.active config option. See linkgit:gitsubmodules[7] for
> >     details.
> >  
> >  submodule.active::
> >     A repeated field which contains a pathspec used to match against a
> >     submodule's path to determine if the submodule is of interest to git
> > -   commands. See linkgit:git-submodule[1] for details.
> > +   commands. See linkgit:gitsubmodule[7] for details.
> 
> Gah, and I can't spell.  This one should have been
> linkgit:gitsubmodules[7].  Updated diff below.  Tested using
> 
>       make -C Documentation/ git-config.html gitsubmodules.html
>       w3m Documentation/git-config.html
> 
> Thanks and sorry for the noise,
> Jonathan
> 
> diff --git i/Documentation/config.txt w/Documentation/config.txt
> index 1277731aa4..340eb1f3c4 100644
> --- i/Documentation/config.txt
> +++ w/Documentation/config.txt
> @@ -3327,13 +3327,13 @@ submodule.<name>.ignore::
>  submodule.<name>.active::
>       Boolean value indicating if the submodule is of interest to git
>       commands.  This config option takes precedence over the
> -     submodule.active config option. See linkgit:git-submodule[1] for
> +     submodule.active config option. See linkgit:gitsubmodules[7] for
>       details.
>  
>  submodule.active::
>       A repeated field which contains a pathspec used to match against a
>       submodule's path to determine if the submodule is of interest to git
> -     commands. See linkgit:git-submodule[1] for details.
> +     commands. See linkgit:gitsubmodules[7] for details.
>  
>  submodule.recurse::
>       Specifies if commands recurse into submodules by default. This

Yep this is what I meant.

-- 
Brandon Williams

Reply via email to