On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com>
>> + /* No arguments, no prefix -> no pathspec */
>> + if (!entry && !prefix)
>> + return;
>> + /* No arguments with prefix -> prefix pathspec */
> When working with the old get_pathspec(), I remember wondering if a
> flag switching between "no argument -> prefix pathspec" and "no
> argument -> no pathspec" would be worthwhile. I think e.g. 'add' and
> 'clean' would use the former , while 'reset' and 'commit' would use
> the latter. Since you're now changing all the callers of
> get_pathspec(), it seems like the perfect time to ask this question.
> What do you think?
Yes that'll simplify the call sites. Will do.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html