On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 06:43:14PM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote:
> static void show_line(struct grep_opt *opt, char *bol, char *eol,
> - const char *name, unsigned lno, char sign)
> + const char *name, unsigned lno, unsigned cno, char sign)
Here "cno" is unsigned. But later...
> + if (opt->columnnum && cno) {
> + char buf[32];
> + xsnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%d", cno);
...we print it with "%d". Should this be "%u"?
But ultimately, the column number comes from this code:
> @@ -1785,6 +1796,7 @@ static int grep_source_1(struct grep_opt *opt, struct
> grep_source *gs, int colle
> while (left) {
> char *eol, ch;
> int hit;
> + ssize_t cno;
> ssize_t col = -1, icol = -1;
>
> /*
> @@ -1850,7 +1862,15 @@ static int grep_source_1(struct grep_opt *opt, struct
> grep_source *gs, int colle
> show_pre_context(opt, gs, bol, eol, lno);
> else if (opt->funcname)
> show_funcname_line(opt, gs, bol, lno);
> - show_line(opt, bol, eol, gs->name, lno, ':');
> + cno = opt->invert ? icol : col;
> + if (cno < 0) {
> + /*
> + * A negative cno means that there was no match.
> + * Clamp to the beginning of the line.
> + */
> + cno = 0;
> + }
...which is a ssize_t. Should we just be using ssize_t consistently?
We do at least clamp the negative values here, but on 64-bit systems
ssize_t is much larger than "unsigned". I admit that it's probably
ridiculous for any single line to overflow 32 bits, but it seems like we
should consistently use size_t/ssize_t for buffer offsets, and then we
don't have to think about it.
-Peff
