Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> writes:

>> On Jul 8, 2018, at 8:30 PM, larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>> From: Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com>
>> 
>> Refactor conversion driver config parsing to ease the parsing of new
>> configs in a subsequent patch.
>> 
>> No functional change intended.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> convert.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/convert.c b/convert.c
>> index 64d0d30e08..949bc783e4 100644
>> --- a/convert.c
>> +++ b/convert.c
>> @@ -1003,43 +1003,43 @@ static int read_convert_config(const char *var, 
>> const char *value, void *cb)
>>      int namelen;
>>      struct convert_driver *drv;
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> -    /*
>> -     * filter.<name>.smudge and filter.<name>.clean specifies
>> -     * the command line:
>> -     *
>> -     *      command-line
>> -     *
>> -     * The command-line will not be interpolated in any way.
>> -     */
>> +            /*
>> +             * filter.<name>.smudge and filter.<name>.clean specifies
>> +             * the command line:
>> +             *
>> +             *      command-line
>> +             *
>> +             * The command-line will not be interpolated in any way.
>> +             */
>
> I stumbled over this comment introduced in aa4ed402c9 
> ("Add 'filter' attribute and external filter driver definition.", 2007-04-21).
>
> Is the middle "command-line" intentional?

I think it was a deliberate but ineffective attempt to emphasize the
fact that the command line is used as-is, and does not get split at
SP nor goes through interpolation of placeholders using API such as
strbuf_expand().

Reply via email to