On 7/25/2018 2:08 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jonathan Tan <jonathanta...@google.com> writes:+ } else if (!strcmp(av[1], "commit_contains")) { + struct ref_filter filter; + struct contains_cache cache; + init_contains_cache(&cache); + + if (ac > 2 && !strcmp(av[2], "--tag")) + filter.with_commit_tag_algo = 1; + else + filter.with_commit_tag_algo = 0; + + printf("%s(_,A,X,_):%d\n", av[1], commit_contains(&filter, A, X, &cache));Should we initialize filter (with {NULL} or some equivalent)?Sounds like a sensible suggestion. Wouldn't we segfault otherwise depending on what garbage bytes are on the stack?
It's a good idea to initialize the struct properly, but the only part of the 'filter' struct that is accessed by that method is the 'with_commit_tag_algo' member. Everything else is read from A, X, and cache.
Thanks, -Stolee
