Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com> writes: >> + /* N_() will get "<>" around, resulting in >> "<refname>:<expect>" */ > > ...but this comment isn't accurate at all, N_() doesn't wrap the string > with <>'s, as can be seen by applying this patch:
I know. It is a short-hand for "what's inside N_() we see here". Try to come up with an equivalent that fits on a 80-char line.
