Jeff King <> writes:

> ... did you have any comment on
> the "struct config_key" alternative I sent as a follow-up?

I did read it but I cannot say I did so very carefully.  My gut
reaction was that the "take the variable name and section name,
return the subsection name pointer and length, if there is any, and
the key" made it readable enough.  The proposed interface to make
and lend a copy to the caller does make it more readble, but I do
not know if that is worth doing.  Neutral-to-slightly-in-favor, I
would say.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to