> Yes, that makes even the capitalized "CON" issues go away. It's not a
> one-to-one mapping, though ("foo-" and "foo_" map to the same entity).foo_ would map to foo__, and foo- would map to something else. (foo- as we do not rewrite dashes, yet?) > > If we want that, too, I think something like url-encoding is fine, with > the caveat that we simply urlencode _more_ things (i.e., anything not in > [a-z_]). Yeah I think we need more than url encoding now.
