On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 02:21:51AM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:37:25AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> 
> > It seems to me that aside from t/helper/test-hash-speed.c and
> > t/t0014-hash.sh everything being added here modifies existing files with
> > many authors, and would thus also need their permission to re-license as
> > anything except GPLv2.
> > 
> > Or do you mean whatever fixes/changes you did to libtomcrypt (living in
> > sha256/block/ in this series) you consider e.g. LPGL instead of GPL?
> 
> Yes, that's what I mean, specifically the code in sha256/block.  libgit2
> is GPLv2 with a linking exception, I believe, but either way I'd be fine
> with it.
> 
> It wasn't my intention to offer code I didn't wholly author, so thanks
> for clarifying.

I should clarify further: I obviously didn't wholly author the code.  I
do, however, have permission to license it under alternative terms,
since the original was public domain.  I apologize for my
mischaracterization of the situation.
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to