Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07 2018, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Jeff King wrote:
>>> I don't see any point in generating a sorted list and _then_ making an >>> auxiliary hashmap. My idea was that if you're using a sorted string-list >>> for lookup, then you can replace the whole thing with a hash (inserting >>> as you go, rather than sorting at the end). >> >> What if I'm sorting a string list in preparation for emitting a sorted >> list, and I *also* want to perform lookups in that same list? In >> other words: > > If this turns out to be a common use-case perhaps the easiest way to > support that would be to make the hashmap (optionally?) ordered, as Ruby > 1.9 did with their hash implementation: > https://www.igvita.com/2009/02/04/ruby-19-internals-ordered-hash/ That's about recording the order of insertion. I'm talking about something much simpler: sorting an array (as preparation for emitting it) and binary searching to find an entry in that array.
