On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 2:53 AM Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > > Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > > > I guess the question is: is this a thing we would want to make available > > to code to leave in all the time? Or is it just for sticking in > > temporarily for a quick dump? > > > > If the former, then I think it needs the early-return at the least (and > > probably _should_ have the key parameter). > > > > But I get the feeling that you really just want the latter, and are only > > grudgingly being pushed into the former by Junio's suggestion.
That is not quite the case. I did take all but the one suggestion as I think they are good suggestions and I appreciate it. However having the trace key is not useful I would think. (I did not need it for debugging, but presented an API of what I would have found useful) If the key is really that useful, I would just think we can add it on top. > Well, if that is the case, I'd change "my suggestion" (although I > didn't mean to suggest anything concrete). If this was needed > and/or was useful only during the defvelopment of the remainder of > the series, and if this is known to be a half-hearted change that is > not meant to be useful as a general solution, then let's not take > the main part of the series a hostage to this step; rather, we > should drop this change and leave it to another series that is > willing to do it right. It would save both author's and reviewers' > time if we did so. In that case, would we be interested in a separate patch that kills off that function instead? Stefan
