Sam McKelvie <sam...@gmail.com> writes:

>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] submodule: Alllow staged changes for 
>>> get_superproject_working_tree
>> 
>> s/Alllow/allow/;
>> 
>
> Ok, no caps on first letter of subject.

Ah, that, too.  I meant to correct triple ell, though ;-)

When one reviewer says Reviewed-by: but you later found that the
patch was not good enough to deserve a redoing, feel free to redo
the patch and do not add the Reviewed-by: you got for the old one
to your second submission.  The difference between the one that was
reviewed and the one you updated invalidates the stale Reviewed-by:,
essentially.

Some reviewers explicitly state "With this and that nit corrected or
left as-is, the patch is Reviewed-by: me" to tell you that as long
as the difference between the version reviewed and the updated one
is limited within the named issues, you can add Reviewed-by: to your
rerolled patch.

In this case, I think the nits are pretty small and I do not mind
tweaking the version we are discussing on my end, without having you
to send an updated one.

Here is what I'd squash into your commit, with title corrected, if
you are OK with that plan.  In the meantime, I'll keep the following
as a separate patch on top when I merge your fix to 'pu'.

Thanks.

 t/t1500-rev-parse.sh | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/t1500-rev-parse.sh b/t/t1500-rev-parse.sh
index b774cafc5d..01abee533d 100755
--- a/t/t1500-rev-parse.sh
+++ b/t/t1500-rev-parse.sh
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rev-parse --is-shallow-repository in 
non-shallow repo' '
 test_expect_success 'showing the superproject correctly' '
        git rev-parse --show-superproject-working-tree >out &&
        test_must_be_empty out &&
+
        test_create_repo super &&
        test_commit -C super test_commit &&
        test_create_repo sub &&
@@ -142,20 +143,20 @@ test_expect_success 'showing the superproject correctly' '
        echo $(pwd)/super >expect  &&
        git -C super/dir/sub rev-parse --show-superproject-working-tree >out &&
        test_cmp expect out &&
+
        test_commit -C super submodule_add &&
        git -C super checkout -b branch1 &&
        git -C super/dir/sub checkout -b branch1 &&
        test_commit -C super/dir/sub branch1_commit &&
        git -C super add dir/sub &&
        test_commit -C super branch1_commit &&
-       git -C super checkout master &&
-       git -C super checkout -b branch2 &&
-       git -C super/dir/sub checkout master &&
-       git -C super/dir/sub checkout -b branch2 &&
+       git -C super checkout -b branch2 master &&
+       git -C super/dir/sub checkout -b branch2 master &&
        test_commit -C super/dir/sub branch2_commit &&
        git -C super add dir/sub &&
        test_commit -C super branch2_commit &&
        test_must_fail git -C super merge branch1 &&
+
        git -C super/dir/sub rev-parse --show-superproject-working-tree >out &&
        test_cmp expect out
 '

Reply via email to