On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 04:54:51PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> >> Thanks. I had ~400 runs of the tests I ran before and they were all > >> OK. Now trying also with t1701 (which I hadn't noticed was a new > >> test...). > > > > Ran that overnight with the same conditions as before. 2683 OK runs and > > 0 failures (and counting). So it seems like the combination of the two > > fixed the split index bugs. > > I forgot I ad this running, and got up to 45482 OKs and 0 FAILs before > finally Ctrl+C-ing it now :) Yay! \o/ Thanks for testing, and I feel sorry for your poor machine... I will send an updated version to address the (minor) points raised in [1]... well, most likely not today, but hopefully soon-ish. 1 - https://public-inbox.org/git/20180929091429.GF23446@localhost/
