On 10/9/2018 5:10 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgad...@gmail.com> writes:

diff --git a/builtin/repack.c b/builtin/repack.c
index c6a7943d5c..7925bb976e 100644
--- a/builtin/repack.c
+++ b/builtin/repack.c
@@ -432,6 +432,10 @@ int cmd_repack(int argc, const char **argv, const char 
*prefix)
if (!midx_cleared) {
                                /* if we move a packfile, it will invalidated 
the midx */
+                               if (the_repository->objects) {
+                                       
close_midx(the_repository->objects->multi_pack_index);
+                                       
the_repository->objects->multi_pack_index = NULL;
+                               }
                                clear_midx_file(get_object_directory());
                                midx_cleared = 1;
It somehow looks like a bit of layering violation, doesn't it?  When
we are clearing a midx file, don't we always want to do this as well?

You're right. It did feel a bit wrong. In v2, I'll replace this commit with a refactor of clear_midx_file() to do that. One tricky part is that we need to clear the file even if the in-memory struct hasn't been initialized, but I think passing a repository will suffice for that.

CC Stefan: Is there a plan to make get_object_directory() take a repository parameter?

Thanks,

-Stolee

Reply via email to