Rasmus Villemoes <r...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> writes: > So, it seems you're ok with this tightening, but some comment on the > non-interactive use case should be made in the commit log? Or am I > misunderstanding?
I do not think we need any immediate action on this step. I was just wondering if we want two classes of "I am not running you interactively, so assume I said 'yes' when you need to ask me any confirmation on X and Y" and "I am not running you interactively, so assume I said 'no' for safety when you need to ask me any confirmation on Z" supported in the future. Lines with both @ and <> fall into the first class, while lines with only <> fall into the second camp, I would guess.
