Eric Chamberland <eric.chamberl...@giref.ulaval.ca> writes:
> So, hum, do we have some sort of conclusion?
> Shall it be a fix for git to get around that lustre "behavior"?
> If something can be done in git it would be great: it is a *lot*
> easier to change git than the lustre filesystem software for a cluster
> in running in production mode... (words from cluster team) :-/
I thought you already established that simply disabling the progress
display is a sufficient workaround? If that doesn't help, you can try
patching out all use of SIGALRM within git.
Other than that I agree with Junio, from what we've seen so far, Lustre
returns EINTR on all sorts of calls that simply aren't allowed to do so.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html