Hi, On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Agreed. I'm happy to see the test for-loop gone as I noted in > > https://public-inbox.org/git/87d0rm7zeo....@evledraar.gmail.com/ but as > > noted in that v3 feedback the whole "why would anyone want this?" > > explanation is still missing, and this still smells like a workaround > > for a bug we should be fixing elsewhere in the sequencing code. > > Thanks. I share the same impression that this is sweeping a bug > under a wrong rug. I agree that the scenario is under-explained. Of course, I have to say that this is not Tanushree's problem; They only copied what is in https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1854 and @chucklu did not grace us with an explanation, either. Based on historical context, I would wager a bet that the scenario is that some commits that may or may not have been in a different SCM originally and that may or may not have been empty and/or squashed in `master` need to be cherry-picked. But I agree that this should be clarified. I prodded the original wish-haver. Ciao, Dscho
