On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:10 PM Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > > Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > > > This is a resend of sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip, > > with all feedback addressed. As it took some time, I'll send it > > without range-diff, but would ask for full review. > > Is that a "resend" or reroll/update (or whatever word that does not > imply "just sending the same thing again")?
As you noticed, it is an actual update. I started to use resend as DScho seems very unhappy about the word reroll claiming we'd be the only Software community that uses the term reroll for an iteration of a change. I see how resend could sound like retransmission without change. > child_process_init(cp); > - cp->dir = strbuf_detach(&submodule_path, NULL); > - prepare_submodule_repo_env(&cp->env_array); > + cp->dir = xstrdup(repo->worktree); > + prepare_submodule_repo_env(&cp->env_array); > > Hmph, I offhand do not see there would be any difference if you > assigned to cp->dir before or after preparing the repo env, but is > there a reason these two must be done in this updated order that I > am missing? Very similar changes appear multiple times in this > range-diff. Jonathan Tan asked for it to be "diff friendly". This -of course- is range-diff unfriendly. > [...] you seem to be OK with a lot of the changes, I did not find an actionable suggestion. Thanks for still queuing topics during -rc time, Stefan
