On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 2:27 PM Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 4:50 PM Thomas Gummerer <t.gumme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/10, Duy Nguyen wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 9:04 PM Thomas Gummerer <t.gumme...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > Move the worktree tests to t24* to adhere to that guideline. We're > > > > going to make use of the free'd up numbers in a subsequent commit. > > > > > > Heh.. I did the same thing (in my unsent switch-branch/restore-files > > > series) and even used the same 24xx range :D You probably want to move > > > t2028 and t2029 too (not sure if they have landed on 'master') > > > > [...] good to know someone > > thought the same way. I started this work before t2028 and t2029 > > landed on master, so I failed to notice them. > > The thought of renumbering the test script came up as early as > 2015-06-30. See the last bullet point of [1], for instance. > > [1]: > https://public-inbox.org/git/1435640202-95945-1-git-send-email-sunsh...@sunshineco.com/
Ah good. I thought I was just being lazy and picked a random range to add tests. -- Duy
