On Fri, Dec 14 2018, Clement Moyroud wrote:
> My group at work is migrating a CVS repo to Git. The biggest issue we > face so far is the performance of git blame, especially compared to > CVS on the same file. One file especially causes us trouble: it's a > 30k lines file with 25 years of history in 3k+ commits. The complete > repo has 200k+ commits over that same period of time. There's a real-world repo with a shape & size very similar to this that has good performance, gcc.git: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc $ wc -l ChangeLog 20240 ChangeLog $ git log --oneline -- ChangeLog | wc -l 2676 $ git log --oneline | wc -l 165309 $ time git blame ChangeLog >/dev/null real 0m1.977s user 0m1.909s sys 0m0.069s Its history began in 1997, and the changes to the ChangeLog file by its nature is fairly evenly spread through that period. So check out that repo to see if you have similar or worse performance. Does your work repo show the same problem with a history produced with 'git fast-export --anonymize', and if so is that something you'd be OK with sharing?
