On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> As to the pathspec limiting to affect the loop itself, not the
> argument given to the command that is run, I don't think it is
> absolutely needed; I am perfectly fine with declaring that
> for-each-repo goes to repositories in all subdirectories without
> limit, especially if doing so will make the UI issues we have to
> deal with simpler.
Good (since the relative path of each repo will be exported to the
child process, that process can perform path limiting when needed).
> As to the "option to the command, not to the subcommand, -a option",
> I have been assuming that it was a joke patch, but if "git -a grep"
> turns out to be really useful, "submodule foreach" that iterates
> over the submodules may also want to have such a short and sweet
> mechanism. Between "for-each-repo" and "submodule foreach", I do
> not yet have a strong opinion on which one deserves it more.
> Come to think of it, is there a reason why "for-each-repo" should
> not be an extention to "submodule foreach"? We can view this as
> visiting repositories that _could_ be registered as a submodule, in
> addition to iterating over the registered submodules, no?
Yes, but I see some possible problems with that approach:
-'git for-each-repo' does not need to be started from within a git worktree
-'git for-each-repo' and 'git submodule foreach' have different
semantics for --dirty and --clean
-'git for-each-repo' is in C because my 'git-all' shell script was
horribly slow on large directory trees (especially on windows)
All of these problems are probably solvable, but it would require
quite some reworking of git-submodule.sh
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html