On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:55 AM Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > I am about to submit a new iteration of my patch series, would it be too
> > much trouble for you to rebase on top? If it would be, let me know, then I
> > will rebase on top of yours.
>
> Or both of you keep the topics as-is and self-consistent, and let
> the rerere machinery to squash it in when the two topics gets
> merged.
Yeah, I see that commit 8d808e12a2cc ("Merge branch 'js/rebase-am'
into jch", 2019-01-17) has my fix squashed in; thanks Junio.
I'm happy to do whatever is needed with en/rebase-merge-on-sequencer
that makes it easiest for everyone else. I'm assuming right now that
there's nothing I should do to improve it, but if anyone wants me to
rebase it or fix something up, just let me know.
