Hi Phillip,
Le 31/01/2019 à 15:30, Phillip Wood a écrit :
> Hi Alban
>
> On 29/01/2019 15:01, Alban Gruin wrote:
>> This refactors sequencer_add_exec_commands() to work on a todo_list to
>> avoid redundant reads and writes to the disk.
>>
>> Instead of inserting the `exec' commands between the other commands and
>> re-parsing the buffer at the end, they are appended to the buffer once,
>> and a new list of items is created. Items from the old list are copied
>> across and new `exec' items are appended when necessary. This
>> eliminates the need to reparse the buffer, but this also means we have
>> to use todo_list_write_to_disk() to write the file.
>>
>> todo_list_add_exec_commands() and sequencer_add_exec_commands() are
>> modified to take a string list instead of a string -- one item for each
>> command. This makes it easier to insert a new command to the todo list
>> for each command to execute.
>>
>> sequencer_add_exec_commands() still reads the todo list from the disk,
>> as it is needed by rebase -p.
>>
>> complete_action() still uses sequencer_add_exec_commands() for now.
>> This will be changed in a future commit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> builtin/rebase--interactive.c | 15 +++--
>> sequencer.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> sequencer.h | 5 +-
>> 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/builtin/rebase--interactive.c
>> b/builtin/rebase--interactive.c
>> index df19ccaeb9..53056ee713 100644
>> --- a/builtin/rebase--interactive.c
>> +++ b/builtin/rebase--interactive.c
>> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int do_interactive_rebase(struct replay_opts
>> *opts, unsigned flags,
>> const char *onto, const char *onto_name,
>> const char *squash_onto, const char *head_name,
>> const char *restrict_revision, char *raw_strategies,
>> - const char *cmd, unsigned autosquash)
>> + struct string_list *commands, unsigned autosquash)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> const char *head_hash = NULL;
>> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static int do_interactive_rebase(struct
>> replay_opts *opts, unsigned flags,
>> discard_cache();
>> ret = complete_action(the_repository, opts, flags,
>> shortrevisions, onto_name, onto,
>> - head_hash, cmd, autosquash);
>> + head_hash, commands, autosquash);
>> }
>>
>> free(revisions);
>> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ int cmd_rebase__interactive(int argc, const char
>> **argv, const char *prefix)
>> const char *onto = NULL, *onto_name = NULL, *restrict_revision =
>> NULL,
>> *squash_onto = NULL, *upstream = NULL, *head_name = NULL,
>> *switch_to = NULL, *cmd = NULL;
>> + struct string_list commands = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
>> char *raw_strategies = NULL;
>> enum {
>> NONE = 0, CONTINUE, SKIP, EDIT_TODO, SHOW_CURRENT_PATCH,
>> @@ -221,6 +222,12 @@ int cmd_rebase__interactive(int argc, const char
>> **argv, const char *prefix)
>> warning(_("--[no-]rebase-cousins has no effect without "
>> "--rebase-merges"));
>>
>> + if (cmd && *cmd) {
>> + string_list_split(&commands, cmd, '\n', -1);
>
> This whole splitting and later skipping 'exec ' is a bit of a shame - it
> would be much nicer if we could just have one exec command per -x option
> but I think that is outside the scope of this series (If I have time I'd
> like to look at calling do_interactive_rebase() directly from
> builtin/rebase.c without forking rebase--interactive).
>
Yes, I completely agree with you. I thought to do this in preparation
to drop rebase -r.
>> + if (strlen(commands.items[commands.nr - 1].string) == 0)
>
> I'd be tempted just to test the string using !* rather than calling
> strlen.
>
Right. I’m still not used to this pattern.
> Also is there ever a case where the last string isn't empty?
I don’t think so. When rebase.c prepares the arguments for
rebase--interactive, it always add a newline at the end[1]. Do you want
me to drop this check?
>> + --commands.nr;
>> + }
>> +
>> switch (command) {
>> case NONE:
>> if (!onto && !upstream)
>> @@ -228,7 +235,7 @@ int cmd_rebase__interactive(int argc, const char
>> **argv, const char *prefix)
>>
>> ret = do_interactive_rebase(&opts, flags, switch_to,
>> upstream, onto,
>> onto_name, squash_onto, head_name,
>> restrict_revision,
>> - raw_strategies, cmd, autosquash);
>> + raw_strategies, &commands, autosquash);
>> break;
>> case SKIP: {
>> struct string_list merge_rr = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
>> @@ -262,7 +269,7 @@ int cmd_rebase__interactive(int argc, const char
>> **argv, const char *prefix)
>> ret = rearrange_squash(the_repository);
>> break;
>> case ADD_EXEC:
>> - ret = sequencer_add_exec_commands(the_repository, cmd);
>> + ret = sequencer_add_exec_commands(the_repository, &commands);
>> break;
>> default:
>> BUG("invalid command '%d'", command);
>> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
>> index 266f80d704..3a90b419d7 100644
>> --- a/sequencer.c
>> +++ b/sequencer.c
>> @@ -4446,25 +4446,27 @@ int sequencer_make_script(struct repository
>> *r, FILE *out,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * Add commands after pick and (series of) squash/fixup commands
>> - * in the todo list.
>> - */
>> -int sequencer_add_exec_commands(struct repository *r,
>> - const char *commands)
>> +static void todo_list_add_exec_commands(struct todo_list *todo_list,
>> + struct string_list *commands)
>> {
>> - const char *todo_file = rebase_path_todo();
>> - struct todo_list todo_list = TODO_LIST_INIT;
>> - struct strbuf *buf = &todo_list.buf;
>> - size_t offset = 0, commands_len = strlen(commands);
>> - int i, insert;
>> + struct strbuf *buf = &todo_list->buf;
>> + size_t base_offset = buf->len;
>> + int i, insert, nr = 0, alloc = 0;
>> + struct todo_item *items = NULL, *base_items = NULL;
>>
>> - if (strbuf_read_file(&todo_list.buf, todo_file, 0) < 0)
>> - return error(_("could not read '%s'."), todo_file);
>> + base_items = xcalloc(commands->nr, sizeof(struct todo_item));
>> + for (i = 0; i < commands->nr; ++i) {
>> + size_t command_len = strlen(commands->items[i].string);
>>
>> - if (todo_list_parse_insn_buffer(r, todo_list.buf.buf, &todo_list)) {
>> - todo_list_release(&todo_list);
>> - return error(_("unusable todo list: '%s'"), todo_file);
>> + strbuf_addstr(buf, commands->items[i].string);
>> + strbuf_addch(buf, '\n');
>> +
>> + base_items[i].command = TODO_EXEC;
>> + base_items[i].offset_in_buf = base_offset;
>> + base_items[i].arg_offset = base_offset + strlen("exec ");
>> + base_items[i].arg_len = command_len - strlen("exec ");
>> +
>> + base_offset += command_len + 1;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -4473,38 +4475,62 @@ int sequencer_add_exec_commands(struct
>> repository *r,
>> * those chains if there are any.
>> */
>> insert = -1;
>> - for (i = 0; i < todo_list.nr; i++) {
>> - enum todo_command command = todo_list.items[i].command;
>> -
>> - if (insert >= 0) {
>> - /* skip fixup/squash chains */
>> - if (command == TODO_COMMENT)
>> - continue;
>> - else if (is_fixup(command)) {
>> - insert = i + 1;
>> - continue;
>> - }
>> - strbuf_insert(buf,
>> - todo_list.items[insert].offset_in_buf +
>> - offset, commands, commands_len);
>
> In a todo list that looks like
> pick abc message
> #pick cde empty commit
> This inserts the exec command for the first pick above the commented out
> pick. I think your translation puts it below the commented out pick as
> it ignores the value of insert. I think it's probably easiest to add an
> INSERT_ARRAY macro to insert it in the right place. An alternative might
> be to track the last insert position and only copy commands across when
> there is another exec to insert but that might get complicated in cases
> such as
>
> pick abc message
> #squash cde squash! message //empty commit for rewording
> fixup 123 fixup! message
> #pick 456 empty commit
>
I could do this with MOVE_ARRAY(), no?
> Best Wishes
>
> Phillip
>
[1] https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/builtin/rebase.c#L1182-L1191
Cheers,
Alban
