Hello, I want to understand if this behavior is as intended: Suppose we have 3 branches A, B, C. A has common history with B and C (due to previous merge, for example), while B and C have unrelated histories. Doing regular simple merge from B into A and then from C into A works smoothly, however when attempting to do an octopus merge into A from B and C simultaneously git complains with "fatal: refusing to merge unrelated histories". With -allow-unrelated-histories git octopus does two simple merges and it works fine.
Is this the intended behavior or is this an oversight? From my point of view the merges are done from branches B and C into A so it shouldn't matter whether B and C have related histories or not (and it doesn't matter in practice as evidenced by successful merge), only if A has related histories with each of them. Best regards, Danila
