On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Currently, all of the examples for "man git-rebase" show rebasing from
> > a branch that has had no further development, which might mislead
> > readers into thinking that that is a necessary condition for rebasing,
> > so tweak the examples to show further development on such a branch to
> > clarify that.
>
> We state the status-quo in present tense to start problem
> description, so "Currently" is a noise word you can and should omit.
>
> As I already said, at least one example that rebases a branch that
> was forked from the midpoint of another branch, so the problem
> description is already false. If we apply this patch, do we lose
> all examples that rebase a branch that purely builds on top of the
> tip of another branch? That would also mislead readers into
> thinking that you need to advance the base branch before you can
> rebase the forked branch ;-).
i stand corrected. carry on. :-)
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
