Hi Jonathan,

On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <[email protected]>
> > writes:
> > 
> > > From: Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > This fixes an issue pointed out by clang.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  upload-pack.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c
> > > index 2365b707bc..534e8951a2 100644
> > > --- a/upload-pack.c
> > > +++ b/upload-pack.c
> > > @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void create_pack_file(const struct 
> > > object_array *have_obj,
> > >                        const struct string_list *uri_protocols)
> > >  {
> > >   struct child_process pack_objects = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> > > - struct output_state output_state = {0};
> > > + struct output_state output_state = {"\0"};
> > 
> > OK, as the structure looks like
> > 
> >     struct output_state {
> >             char buffer[8193];
> >             int used;
> >             ...
> > 
> > we obviously cannot initialize buffer[] with a single integer 0 ;-)
> > Between "" and "\0" you wondered elsewhere, I have no strong
> > preference, but if I were fixing it, I would probably write it as
> > 
> >     struct output_state output_state = { { 0 } };
> > 
> > so that readers do not even have to waste time to wonder between the
> > two.
> 
> Right. I don't care, as long as Jonathan addresses the compile error on
> clang.

This is *still* broken:
https://dev.azure.com/gitgitgadget/git/_build/results?buildId=4337

Junio, can you please in the least add my fixup! on top of
jt/fetch-cdn-offload?

Thanks,
Dscho

Reply via email to