Jens Lehmann <jens.lehm...@web.de> writes:
> Am 06.02.2013 19:29, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> * jl/submodule-deinit (2013-02-04) 1 commit
>> - submodule: add 'deinit' command
>> There was no Porcelain way to say "I no longer am interested in
>> this submodule", once you express your interest in a submodule with
>> "submodule init". "submodule deinit" is the way to do so.
>> Will merge to 'next'.
> Oops, I though you were waiting for a reroll. Currently I'm having the
> appended interdiff compared to your version. Changes are:
> - Add deinit to the --force documentation of "git submodule"
> - Never remove submodules containing a .git dir, even when forced
> - diagnostic output when "rm -rf" or "mkdir" fails
> - More test cases
> And I wanted to add three more test cases for modified submodules before
> sending v4. You could squash in the first two hunks into the commit you
> have in pu and I'll send a follow up patch with the extra tests soon or
> you could wait for me sending an updated patch. What do you think?
I haven't merged it down to 'next' yet. So please proceed as you
planned. Thanks for stopping me.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html