Jeff King <[email protected]> writes: >> I do not personally think, as the design of v2 stands, a standalone >> "serve" server that "can serve anything as long as it goes over >> protocol v2" makes much sense, but perhaps those who have been doing >> the v2 work may have different ideas, in which case let's hear what >> their plans are. > > I too would like to hear more definite comments from people who think > git-serve is worth keeping. In the meantime, there's some discussion > from this thread in December: > ... > > https://public-inbox.org/git/[email protected]/ > > (In case you do not feel like reading the whole thing, my opinion there > is that git-serve is probably not the right direction, and we would do > well to demote it as Dscho's patch does).
I guess we are more or less on the same page, then. I'll let others chime in by waiting for a bit more but I won't wait forever ;-). Thanks.
