On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:36:53AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I'd rather phrase it like "... may take long, so you would want to
> run it explicitly from time to time to avoid automatic gc kicking in
> when it is not convenient for you".

Works for me.

> Removal of this is a good change, though.

I just read through the manual cover to cover, so I have a number of
other fixes in the pipe (from which I've already submitted the
receive.denyCurrentBranch patch).  Should I bundle them all into a
single series to reduce clutter on the list, or will that just lead to
resending boring fixes while we hash out the right handling for more
involved ones?

Cheers,
Trevor

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to