On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:36:53AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I'd rather phrase it like "... may take long, so you would want to
> run it explicitly from time to time to avoid automatic gc kicking in
> when it is not convenient for you".

Works for me.

> Removal of this is a good change, though.

I just read through the manual cover to cover, so I have a number of
other fixes in the pipe (from which I've already submitted the
receive.denyCurrentBranch patch).  Should I bundle them all into a
single series to reduce clutter on the list, or will that just lead to
resending boring fixes while we hash out the right handling for more
involved ones?


This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to