On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:36:53AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I'd rather phrase it like "... may take long, so you would want to > run it explicitly from time to time to avoid automatic gc kicking in > when it is not convenient for you".
Works for me. > Removal of this is a good change, though. I just read through the manual cover to cover, so I have a number of other fixes in the pipe (from which I've already submitted the receive.denyCurrentBranch patch). Should I bundle them all into a single series to reduce clutter on the list, or will that just lead to resending boring fixes while we hash out the right handling for more involved ones? Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
Description: OpenPGP digital signature