On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:53:04PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael J Gruber <g...@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:
> > After a bisect session, to clean up the bisection state and return to
> > -the original HEAD, issue the following command:
> > +the original HEAD (i.e., to finish bisect), issue the following command:
> Makes sense.
[aww, very sorry for this blunt reply]
The main point of my mail was to stretch the (whether actually intended)
*perceived* start <-> stop symmetry
(which a *user* quite likely would end up searching for in the document,
and fail to find any "stop" keyword, thus not getting to the relevant
reset parameter section in time).
Quite likely I failed to properly word things to make that obvious,
in my quickly carved mail.
To clarify intent behind these docs, I would thus propose to have
the sentence improved to something quite similar to
the original HEAD (i.e., to finish - "stop" a started - bisect),
issue the following command:
Thanks a ton for your immediate handling of my wishlist item!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html